Higher superstition the academic left and its quarrels with science paul r. The academic left and its quarrels with science by paul r. The academic left and its quarrels with science, that any claim of social and ideological influence on the process and content of science is a form of marxist madness. Gross and norman levitt johns hopkins, 1994 by jay labinger caltech and stephen weininger worcester polytechnic inst. Norman levitt, the authors of higher superstition, worry about that but not for the obvious reasons. This is a key book in the current intellectual and academic struggles between certain strands of postmodernism and the deeply unfashionable view that the world exists independently of our perspectives, prejudices, ideologies and languages, and that science is the best way of finding.
Its quarrels with science, the johns hopkins university press, baltimore, 1994. For one thing, they write, science, along with the idea of natural rights, is the core of the western project. So tight is the grip of the left on institutions of higher education, however, that gross and levitt fear an impending struggle in which affirmative action will force science departments to change their practices under naked political pressure. The academic left and its quarrels with science gross, paul r. The academic left and its quarrels with science, higher superstition.
What do we really need to know about science and how it works. Gross and levitts focus on higher superstition serves to divert attention from this. The academic left and its quarrels with science, a blatantly polemical counterattack, gross and levitt take on a diverse group of critics of science. The academic left and its quarrels with science, by paul gross and norman levitt 1994, sokal tried an experiment. Gross, norman levitt with the emergence of cultural studies and the blurring of onceclear academic boundaries, scholars are.
Higher superstition johns hopkins university press books. Higher superstition the academic left and its quarrels with science 1998 edition pdf. Higher superstition, more than a piece of scholarly critique, serves as a political intervention, as a form of boundarywork 25, as a means for bolstering. Gross and levitt s focus on higher superstition serves to divert attention from this. The academic left and its quarrels with science, summary shmoop higher superstition. The second issue concerns gross and levitt s curious belief, as revealed in the subtitle of higher superstition. The controversy over the book higher superstition, by gross and levitt and the recent articles by sokal. Read gross and levitt the higher superstition, 115. Paul gross and norman levitts book higher superstition, presented as a wakeup call to scientists unaware of the dangers posed by the sciencebashers, set the shrill tone of this reaction and led to the appearance of a growing number of scare stories about an antiscience movement in the oped sections of newspapers across the country. Examines the debate over higher superstition gross and levitt, 1994. Asserts that increases in technical control have been at the expense of social and individual control. Access to society journal content varies across our titles. Gross is the university professor of life sciences emeritus at the university of virginia.
The academic left and its quarrels with science paul r. The indictment made in higher superstition, buttressed as it is with so many direct quotes and meticulous documentation, is forceful and persuasive. A cyborg manifesto science, technology and socialistfeminism in the late twentieth centrury. In this they are simply ignorant of the development of the sociology and history of science as. Paul gross and norman levitt s book higher superstition, presented as a wakeup call to scientists unaware of the dangers posed by the sciencebashers, set the shrill tone of this reaction and led to the appearance of a growing number of scare. Sociologists of science and environmentalists were verbally tarred, but so were advocates of alternative medicine, health mainte nance organizations, literary critics who challenge canonical thinking, and scholars who study gender and education. Then, most notably with the publication of paul gross and norman levitts higher superstition 1, and subsequently with alan sokals notorious spoof published in the journal social text 2, a. Gross, norman levitt with the emergence of cultural studies and the blurring of onceclear academic boundaries, scholars are turning to subjects far outside. The academic left and its quarrels with science is a 1994 book about the philosophy of science by the biologist paul r. This is a key book in the current intellectual and academic struggles between certain strands of postmodernism and the deeply unfashionable view that the world exists independently of our perspectives, prejudices, ideologies and languages, and that science is. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.
Simply responding at the level of epistemology and of scholarship perpetuates this diversion. Who needs the science wars when youve got this on the. Higher superstition by gross and levitt was not written for the man in the street. He has written widely on biology, evolution and creationism, and the intellectual. Nuttiness among intellectuals flourishes perennially. Gross is a biologist and author, perhaps best known to the general public for higher superstition 1994, written with norman levitt. In reading and relativism, i mentioned alan sokals explanation, in a radio interview, of how higher superstition and, in particular, its sarcastic treatment of the derrida quote, was a source of inspiration for his hoax of the journal, social text. A tale of two cultures and other higher superstitions. Then, most notably with the publication of paul gross and norman levitt s higher superstition 1, and subsequently with alan sokals notorious spoof published in the journal social text 2, a. The academic left and its quarrels with science new ed by gross, paul r. Gross and levitt defend the epistemological integrity of science from the relativist onslaught with a biting wit and a cavalier disregard for political correctness. The academic left and its quarrels with science, symbolism higher superstition. Therefore they wrote in a language that i call academese. With the emergence of cultural studies and the blurring of onceclear academic boundaries, scholars are turning to subjects far outside their traditional disciplines and areas of expertise.
Although they go out of their way to distance themselves from other attacks on political correctness, professors gross and levitt are perfectly aware of the shameful way the left employs moral intimidation to disarm criticism and. Higher superstition the academic left and its quarrels with science autor. Gross and norman levitts higher superstitiona frontal attack on science studies as an antiscience movement engineered by feminists and the academic leftwhich inspired alan sokalshoaxandagreatdeal of handwringing within our. Jan 01, 1994 higher superstition is a wickedly perceptive takedown of the absurdities of the academic postmodern left and their perspectivist critique of science.
Contents preface to the 1998 edition ix acknowledgments xv one the academic left and science 1. In the absence of a verifiable reality not only are the tenets of science reduced to a relativistic narrative, so is, for example, history. The second issue concerns gross and levitts curious belief, as revealed in the subtitle of higher superstition. Higher superstition is a wickedly perceptive takedown of the absurdities of the academic postmodern left and their perspectivist critique of science. The academic left and its quarrels with science baltimore. He asked, would the leading north american journal of cultural studieswhose editorial collective includes such luminaries as fredric jameson. Norman, 1943publication date 1994 topics science, humanities. Gross, norman levitt with the emergence of cultural studies and the blurring of onceclear academic boundaries, scholars are turning to subjects far outside their traditional disciplines and areas of expertise. In higher superstition scientists paul gross and norman levitt raise serious questions about the growing criticism of science by humanists and social scientists on the academic left.
Gross university of virginia norman levitt rutgers university the johns hopkins university press. Science, technology and human values science and technology studies 101 history of science 101. Paul gross and norman levitt s book higher superstition, presented as a wakeup call to scientists unaware of the dangers posed by the sciencebashers, set the shrill tone of this reaction and led to the appearance of a growing number of scare stories about an antiscience movement in the oped sections of newspapers across the country. Science, technology and human values science and technology studies 101 history of science 101 fall 2002 prof. Gross university of virginia norman levitt rutgers university the johns hopkins university press baltimore and london contents preface to the 1998 edition acknowledgments ix xv one the academic left and science 1. Higher superstition is as sharply polemical in its dissection of leftwing academic blather as anything yet written. Pdf higher superstition download full pdf book download.
The antirealism of constructivism allows for historical revisionism independent of verifiable historical data since such data are merely constructed. I confess that i was delighted to read the letter from gross and levitt, and i briefly considered asking the new york. On the sokal hoax see, most recently, jennifer ruark, anatomy of a hoax, chronicle of higher education, 6 jan. If you have access to a journal via a society or association membership, please browse to your society journal, select an article to view, and follow the instructions in this box. They assumed probably correctly that their book would not attract a general readership. Norman, 1943publication date 1994 topics science, humanities publisher. The academic left and its quarrels with science, litcharts higher superstition. This paperback edition of higher superstition includes a new afterword by the authors. Although the quote loomed large in sokals announcement. Gross a biologist and norman levitt a mathematician offer some answers. To subjects far outside their traditional disciplines and areas of expertise in higher superstition scientists paul gross and norman levitt raise serious questions about the growing criticism of science by humanists and social scientists on the academic left this paperback. Puts forward the arguments in the book and the response to the book from members of the us science and technology studies community. In this they are simply ignorant of the development of the sociology and history of science as disciplines.
925 584 923 180 315 1018 258 1053 1426 174 597 205 1322 907 1346 1097 455 897 21 156 1010 390 890 1240 203 251 1242 569 282 1497 175 958 626 811 248 914 165 1290 1349 1239 68 549 799 735 432 435 185 208 499